Since 2006 — Nearly two decades of continuous cybersecurity operations in India

Secure Code Review That Finds What ScannersCannot

AI-augmented source code analysis with mandatory manual validation by senior security architects. Framework-specific findings with exact file, line, and function references — not generic scanner dumps your developers will ignore.

6,700+Assessments
700+Clients
150+Team
2006Founded

Trusted by India's leading enterprises

ICICI Bank
HDFC
PhonePe
Swiggy
Asian Paints
Mahindra
L&T
Aditya Birla
Pernod Ricard
Yes Bank
DHL Express
Etihad Airways
Amazon Pay
Sephora
Groww
Pharmeasy
BillDesk
Jubilant Foods
ICICI Bank
HDFC
PhonePe
Swiggy
Asian Paints
Mahindra
L&T
Aditya Birla
Pernod Ricard
Yes Bank
DHL Express
Etihad Airways
Amazon Pay
Sephora
Groww
Pharmeasy
BillDesk
Jubilant Foods
STEP 01

Share Your Codebase

Grant secure repository access or upload source code via our encrypted portal. We support all major version control systems and accept code in any language or framework.

STEP 02

AI-Augmented Analysis with Manual Validation

Our B-52 AI engine performs large-scale static analysis while senior security architects manually validate every finding, eliminate false positives, and trace business logic flaws that automated tools miss entirely.

STEP 03

Receive Actionable, Developer-Ready Report

Get a report with exact file paths, line numbers, vulnerable code snippets, and framework-specific remediation code examples. Your developers fix issues without guesswork, and we verify fixes through retesting.

What Is Secure Code Review?

Secure code review is a systematic examination of an application's source code to identify security vulnerabilities, insecure coding patterns, and logic flaws before they reach production. Unlike dynamic testing that probes a running application, code review analyzes the actual codebase to find issues at their root — including hardcoded secrets, broken access controls, and framework misconfigurations that external scanners cannot…

Beyond SAST Scanner Output: What Our Code Review ActuallyCovers

Most code review services run a SAST tool and hand you the output. We analyze your code in the context of your business logic, architecture, and deployment environment.

Authentication and Session Management

Review of login flows, token generation, session handling, password storage, MFA implementation, and OAuth/SSO integration for security weaknesses.

Authorization and Access Control Logic

Analysis of role-based access controls, privilege escalation paths, IDOR vulnerabilities, and horizontal/vertical authorization bypass in business workflows.

Input Validation and Injection Flaws

Identification of SQL injection, XSS, command injection, SSRF, template injection, and other input handling weaknesses across all entry points.

Business Logic and Transaction Integrity

Review of payment flows, order processing, state management, race conditions, and workflow manipulation vulnerabilities that SAST tools fundamentally cannot detect.

Secrets and Configuration Management

Detection of hardcoded API keys, database credentials, encryption keys, and insecure configuration patterns across environment files and deployment manifests.

Cryptographic Implementation

Assessment of encryption algorithms, key management, hashing functions, certificate validation, and secure communication protocols for implementation flaws.

API Security and Data Exposure

Review of API endpoints for over-permissive responses, missing rate limiting, broken object-level authorization, and unintended data exposure in serialization logic.

Framework-Specific Security Patterns

Assessment of framework-specific security mechanisms and common misconfigurations in Next.js, Laravel, Spring Boot, Django, Express, Rails, and other popular frameworks.

Third-Party Dependencies and Supply Chain Risk

Analysis of open-source libraries and packages for known vulnerabilities, unmaintained dependencies, and supply chain attack vectors in your dependency tree.

Methodology

7 steps. Zero guesswork.

Every engagement follows this process through Lemon, our proprietary audit management platform.

Discovery
01

Scoping and Architecture Analysis

We analyze your application architecture, data flow diagrams, deployment configuration, and technology stack to define the review scope and prioritize high-risk code paths. Business context is gathered to understand critical workflows, transaction flows, and compliance requirements that should receive focused attention.

02

B-52 AI Large-Scale Static Analysis

Our B-52 AI engine performs large-scale automated static analysis across the entire codebase, identifying vulnerability patterns, insecure coding practices, hardcoded secrets, and dependency risks. The AI generates dynamic payloads tailored to your application's technology stack for edge-case vulnerability discovery and WAF bypass technique identification.

03

Manual Expert Code Review

Senior security architects manually review all AI-generated findings and perform deep analysis of business logic, authentication flows, authorization mechanisms, transaction processing, and state management. This phase catches the vulnerabilities that automated tools fundamentally cannot detect — logic flaws, race conditions, and architectural weaknesses.

Testing
04

False Positive Elimination

Every finding is validated for exploitability in the context of your application's actual deployment and configuration. Theoretical risks and false positives are removed. Only confirmed, reproducible vulnerabilities with demonstrated business impact make it into the final report.

05

SAST Tool Integration and Correlation

We integrate with your existing SAST tools such as Fortify, Checkmarx, SonarQube, or Veracode — correlating their output with our manual findings to identify gaps in your current tooling coverage. This gives you a clear picture of what your existing tools catch and what they miss.

Delivery
06

L1/L2/L3 Multi-Layer Quality Review

The L1 auditor's findings undergo review by an L2 Senior Security Consultant who validates methodology and identifies coverage gaps, followed by L3 Security Architect review for final validation of impact assessments and reporting accuracy. No report is released without clearing all quality gates.

07

Reporting and Remediation Support

Detailed report delivered with exact file paths, line numbers, vulnerable code snippets, and framework-specific remediation code examples. Remediation walkthrough sessions with your development team ensure findings are understood. Multiple rounds of retesting verify that fixes are correctly implemented.

"Security Brigade's structured approach through Lemon gave us complete visibility into the testing process. The three-layer review caught issues that our previous vendor missed entirely. Their reports were the first our developers could actually act on without a follow-up call."
CISO, Leading Indian BFSI Enterprise
Top 5 Private Sector Bank · Engaged since 2019

Read more client stories →

The Platform

Powered by Lemon

Most firms rely on individual tester skill. We built a platform that makes quality structural — informed by 6,700+ previous assessments.

lemon.securitybrigade.com/project/PRJ-2847
D
C
F
R
T
PROJECT PRJ-2847
Coverage Validation — acmecorp.com
94% covered
Endpoints
247 / 263
Parameters
1,847
Auth Flows
12 / 12
JS Routes
38 / 41
AI flagged 3 undiscovered endpoints
/api/v2/admin/export, /api/v2/billing/webhook, /internal/healthcheck
L1 Complete
L2 In Review
L3 Pending

Next.js and React

Server-side rendering security, API route authorization, middleware bypass, environment variable exposure, and SSR/CSR data serialization risks.

Laravel and PHP

Eloquent ORM injection, mass assignment, blade template XSS, middleware misconfiguration, CSRF token handling, and queue/job security.

Spring Boot and Java

Spring Security configuration, actuator endpoint exposure, deserialization vulnerabilities, JDBC injection, and bean manipulation risks.

Compliance-Ready

Audit-ready reporting for every framework

As a CERT-In empanelled firm, our reports are accepted by all major Indian and global regulators.

PCI DSS
Requirement 6.3 mandates secure code rev
RBI Cyber Security Framework
Source code review is a recommended cont
CERT-In Standards
Aligned with CERT-In's application secur
OWASP ASVS
Review methodology maps to OWASP Applica
SOC 2
Code review findings and remediation tra
SEBI Cyber Security Framework
Application security testing including c
BFSI: Banks, NBFCs, Insurance, Fintech
Deep expertise in financial application
SaaS and Technology Companies
Pre-launch code reviews, SOC 2 readiness
E-Commerce and Consumer Platforms
Payment processing security, customer da
Healthcare and Pharma
EMR/EHR application security, telemedici
Pre-IPO and High-Growth Companies
Making fast-scaling codebases audit-read
Manufacturing and Enterprise
Securing customer portals, supply chain

Industries

700+ clients across verticals

Every type of application architecture and business logic pattern — tested.

BFSIICICI Bank, HDFC, Yes Bank, UTI MF, Edelweiss
Fintech & PaymentsPhonePe, Amazon Pay, Groww, BillDesk
ManufacturingMahindra, Asian Paints, L&T, Hindalco
Retail & ConsumerSwiggy, Sephora, Pernod Ricard, Jubilant
Aviation & LogisticsEtihad Airways, DHL Express, Shadowfax
HealthcareCloudNine, Pharmeasy, Wave Health

Deliverables

What you get

Reports for two audiences — executives who need the risk picture, and developers who need to fix the issues. With code-level guidance, not vague advice.

Executive Security Report

Risk overview, critical vulnerability summary, business impact analysis, and remediation prioritization for C-suite and board-level stakeholders.

Technical Code Review Report

Every finding includes exact file path, line number, vulnerable code snippet, exploitation scenario, CVSS severity, and framework-specific remediation code examples.

Vulnerability Tracker with Remediation Status

Structured tracker showing each finding, assigned developer, remediation status, and retesting results — accessible in real time through Lemon.

SAST Gap Analysis Report

Comparison of our findings against your existing SAST tool output, identifying classes of vulnerabilities your current tooling misses.

Remediation Walkthrough Sessions

Live sessions with your development team to explain findings, demonstrate exploitation, and guide implementation of fixes where needed.

Security Assessment Certificate

Formal certificate confirming the application underwent structured code review. Issued after remediation and validation are complete for compliance and vendor due diligence.

FAQ

Common questions

Can't find what you're looking for? Talk to our team.

Contact us
What is the difference between secure code review and SAST?+
SAST (Static Application Security Testing) is an automated scan of source code that identifies known vulnerability patterns. Secure code review includes SAST as one input but adds expert manual analysis of business logic, authorization flows, and architectural weaknesses that automated tools cannot detect. Our approach uses B-52 AI for large-scale automated analysis, then mandates manual validation of every finding by senior security architects.
What programming languages and frameworks do you support?+
We are language-agnostic and review code written in any programming language. We have specialized depth in Next.js, React, Laravel, PHP, Spring Boot, Java, Django, Python, Node.js, Express, Ruby on Rails, Go, .NET, Kotlin, and Swift. Our framework-specific expertise means findings include remediation guidance tailored to your exact technology stack, not generic recommendations.
How long does a secure code review take?+
A typical secure code review takes 8 to 15 business days depending on the codebase size, application complexity, and number of frameworks involved. Large enterprise applications with multiple microservices may require longer timelines. We provide a precise estimate after the scoping call once we understand your application architecture and codebase size.
Do you integrate with our existing SAST tools like Fortify or Checkmarx?+
Yes. We correlate our findings with output from your existing SAST tools including Fortify, Checkmarx, SonarQube, Veracode, and others. The SAST Gap Analysis deliverable shows you exactly which vulnerability classes your current tooling catches and which it misses, helping you optimize your existing investment.
Can code review findings be integrated into our CI/CD pipeline?+
Yes. Through the Lemon API, code review findings can be integrated directly into your CI/CD pipeline for automated security gating. This enables your engineering team to track vulnerability status alongside development workflows and block deployments that contain unresolved critical findings.
How do you handle false positives in code review?+
Every finding generated by our B-52 AI engine undergoes mandatory manual validation by a senior security architect before it is included in the final report. The L1/L2/L3 multi-layer review process further validates impact and exploitability. Only confirmed, reproducible vulnerabilities with demonstrated business impact are reported, which is why our false positive rate is near zero.
Is secure code review required for PCI DSS compliance?+
Yes. PCI DSS Requirement 6.3 explicitly mandates that organizations either perform secure code reviews or implement a web application firewall for applications that handle cardholder data. A structured secure code review is the more thorough approach and is preferred by QSAs. Our reports are structured to satisfy PCI DSS audit evidence requirements.
What is the difference between code review and penetration testing?+
Penetration testing assesses a running application from the outside, simulating real-world attacks against the deployed system. Secure code review examines the source code itself to find vulnerabilities at their root cause. Code review catches issues like hardcoded secrets, insecure logic, and architectural flaws that may not be exploitable from a black-box perspective but represent serious risk. The two services are complementary and most mature security programs use both.
How do you ensure confidentiality of our source code?+
Source code is handled under strict NDA and data handling agreements. Code is accessed through secure, encrypted channels — either direct repository access with time-limited credentials or encrypted upload to our secure environment. All code is deleted from our systems upon engagement completion, and Lemon maintains a full audit trail of who accessed what and when.
Do you provide remediation support or just findings?+
We provide comprehensive remediation support. Every finding includes framework-specific remediation code examples showing developers exactly how to fix each issue. We also conduct live remediation walkthrough sessions with your development team. Multiple rounds of retesting are included so your team can verify fixes iteratively as they implement them.

Stay protected between assessments with ShadowMap

Continuous attack surface monitoring — discovers new assets, detects credential leaks, and alerts on new exposures the day they appear.

Learn about ShadowMap →

Your Code Deserves More Than a Scanner Dump

Get a structured, AI-augmented secure code review with framework-specific findings and developer-ready remediation guidance.

Typically responds within 1 business day · No commitment required

Get a Quote